College Football Playoff Flaws Displayed with Unjustified Seedings in Expanded Format

A Deeper Look at the Controversial Decisions

The College Football Playoff (CFP) has been a topic of debate since its inception in 2014. Critics have argued that the current format, which includes a four-team playoff, is flawed and does not always produce the best possible matchups. This year, the controversy surrounding the CFP has been reignited following the release of the final rankings.

Top Two Teams Left Out

One of the most controversial aspects of this year's CFP is the exclusion of the two top-ranked teams, Georgia and Ohio State. Both teams finished the regular season with undefeated records and were widely regarded as the best in the country. However, they were both leapfrogged by No. 3 Alabama and No. 4 Michigan, who both had one loss on their resumes. This decision was met with widespread criticism, with many arguing that the CFP committee had made a mistake.

Unfair Advantages

Another flaw in the current CFP format is that it gives an unfair advantage to teams from the Power Five conferences. These conferences are the most dominant in college football and have a history of sending multiple teams to the CFP. This year, all four teams in the playoff are from Power Five conferences. This means that teams from smaller conferences have a much smaller chance of making the playoff, even if they have a better record or have performed better on the field.

Possible Solutions

There are a number of possible solutions to the flaws in the current CFP format. One option would be to expand the playoff to eight teams. This would give teams from smaller conferences a better chance to make the playoff and would also reduce the likelihood of a team with a weak resume making the playoff. Another option would be to use a different ranking system. The current system relies heavily on polls, which can be subjective and biased. A more objective ranking system would help to ensure that the best teams are making the playoff.

Conclusion

The College Football Playoff is a flawed system that does not always produce the best possible matchups. The current format gives an unfair advantage to teams from the Power Five conferences and leaves out some of the best teams in the country. There are a number of possible solutions to the flaws in the CFP format, and it is likely that the committee will make changes in the future.